The RBI also made a move on the quantum of liquidity. Governor Das guided to “engage in a gradual and calibrated withdrawal of liquidity over a multi-year time frame...to restore the size of liquidity surplus...to a level consistent with the prevailing stance of the monetary policy”.

Currently, 1-2 months government treasury bills are trading near 3.70%. A reduction in the quantum of liquidity will push the money market rates higher towards the repo rate. However, we do not see money market rates sustaining significantly above the repo rate as overall liquidity condition may remain in surplus even after the normalization is completed.

Uncertainty vs Valuation

Given the RBI was unexpectedly dovish in the December 2021 and February 2022 monetary policy, this hawkish pivot by the RBI came as surprise to many. It spooked the bond markets.

The yield on the 10-year government bond jumped 20 basis points after the policy, while that on the 5-year bond surged around 30 basis points.

At current levels of bond yields, much of the potential rate hikes and liquidity normalization are already priced in.

Most of the medium to long-duration bonds are trading at a yield higher than their pre-pandemic levels when the repo rate was at 5.15%.

The 10-year benchmark government bond is currently trading around 7.15% (as of April 11, 2022); this level was last seen in Early 2019 when the rate easing cycle started. To recall, the repo rate was then at 6.0%.

The spread of the10-year over 1-year government bond is currently at 211 basis points. This is more than double its 20 year average of 84 basis points

So, it would be reasonable to assume that the medium to long-term bonds would not be too sensitive to the (initial) rate hikes by the RBI, which are only normalization of the crisis time monetary policy.

Instead, what we worry about are -

- the severe demand-supply gap in the domestic government bond market, given the sharp jump in government bond supply to Rs. 15 trillion in FY23,

- geopolitical uncertainty and its impact on global supply chains and commodity prices especially crude oil, and

- the pace of rate hikes and balance sheet reduction by the US Federal Reserve.

The path forward for bonds is filled with uncertainty. Things are still evolving on the geopolitical front and the unwinding of ultra-easy monetary policy has just started. So, there will be surprises, there will be miscommunications and there will be market overreactions.

We expect the current phase of market volatility to continue until the market finds its own balance or things settle down on the global front.

We may see the 10-year government bond yield rising to 7.3%-7.5% in the coming months as the supply pressure kicks in. A hope of RBI support will continue to put a cap on the long-term bond yields beyond that level.

Governor Das assured the markets of its support by saying – “we remain focussed on completion of the borrowing programme of the Government and towards this end, the RBI will deploy various instruments as warranted.”

Given the RBI will be reducing liquidity this year, any outright commitment of a sizeable bond-buying program on the lines of the Government Securities Acquisition Programme (G-SAP) looks unlikely. The RBI may intervene tactically to guide the market expectations from time to time, though the market will keep testing the RBI’s willingness and ability to support at every yield spike.

Portfolio Positioning

In the Quantum Dynamic Bond Fund, we have been avoiding long-term bonds for some time due to our cautious stance on the markets. The defensive positioning helped the portfolio ride through the market sell-off over the last three months.

After the steep sell-off in the last one and a half months, valuations have become even more attractive on medium to long-term bonds. However, given the high uncertainty as mentioned above, we will continue to avoid long-duration bonds as a core portfolio position. We are keeping the bulk of our portfolio position in 2-5 years bonds which in our opinion, offers the critical balance between duration and accrual.

We would remain open and nimble to exploit any market mispricing by making a measured tactical allocation to any part of the bond yield curve as and when the opportunity arises.

As some of the uncertainties mentioned above fades away or bond yields move up to price those risks appropriately, we would look to add some allocation to medium to long-term bonds and increase portfolio duration.

We stand vigilant to react and change the portfolio positioning in case our view on the market changes.

What should Investors do?

In an environment of high uncertainty, it would be prudent for investors to avoid excessive credit and interest rate risk.

In our opinion, a combination of liquid to money market funds and short-term debt funds, and/or dynamic bond funds with low credit risks should remain as the core fixed income allocation.

After more than 100 bps sell-off in the bond market over the last year, the return potential of debt funds has improved significantly. However, it would not be a smooth ride as markets will continue to have bouts of volatility.

We suggest bond fund investors to have a longer holding period to ride through any intermittent turbulence in the market.

For any queries directly linked to the insights and data shared in the newsletter, please reach out to the author – Pankaj Pathak, Fund Manager – Fixed Income at [email protected].

For all other queries, please contact Neeraj Kotian – Area Manager, Quantum AMC at [email protected] / [email protected] or call him on Tel: 9833289034

Read our last few Debt Market Observer write-ups -
- Geopolitics, Oil and the Bond Market
- The Fed Ultimatum